Additional Resources
Anonymizing Data
Data anonymization in R (Górecki, 2014)
Data Sharing and Data Policy
Qualitative data sharing and re-use for socio-environmental systems research: A synthesis of opportunities, challenges, resources and approaches (Jones et al., 2018)
Qualitative data sharing and synthesis for sustainability science (Alexander et al., 2019)
A conceptual framework for managing very diverse data for complex, interdisciplinary science (Parsons et al., 2011)
Working with Data (NSF Arctic Data Center, n.d.)
Sensitive Data Guidelines (NSF Arctic Data Center, n.d.)
Guidance on External Sharing of Human Subjects Research Data (University of Wisconsin-Madison, n.d.)
Open Data Policies (Princeton Research Data Service, n.d.)
Reproducible Data Management (University of California San Francisco, n.d.)
Research Best Practices
Negotiating Research Relationships with Inuit Communities: A Guide for Researchers (Nickels, 2006)
Conducting Research with Tribal Communities: Sovereignty, Ethics, and Data-Sharing Issues (Harding et al., 2012)
Ethical Principles for the Conduct of Research in the North (Association of Canadian Universities for Northern Studies, 2003)
Co-Production and Reconciliation
Freedom of Expression or Freedom of Exploitation (Flaherty, 1994)
Bibliography
Alcock, Elgie, J., Richmond, C., & White, J. (2017). Developing Ethical Research Practices Between Institutional and Community Partners: A Look at the Current Base of Literature Surrounding Memorandums of Understanding in Canada. International Indigenous Policy Journal, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.18584/iipj.2017.8.4.3
Allemann, L. & Dudeck, S. (2019). Sharing Oral History With Arctic Indigenous Communities: Ethical Implications of Bringing Back Research Results. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(9–10), 890–906. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417738800
Bengfort, B. (n.d.). A Practical Guide to Anonymizing Datasets with Python and Faker. District Data Labs. https://www.districtdatalabs.com/a-practical-guide-to-anonymizing-datasets-with-python-faker
Boston College. (n.d.) Example of an Initial Application. https://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/research/vpr/Example%20IRB%20Application%2012.6.18%20revised%20(1).pdf
Bouffard, T. J., Uryupova, E., Dodds, K., Romanovsky, V. E., Bennett, A. P., & Streletskiy, D. (2021). Scientific Cooperation: Supporting Circumpolar Permafrost Monitoring and Data Sharing. Land, 10(6), 590. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10060590
Cameron, A. E. (2015). How I Learned To Stop Worrying and Love the IRB. Contexts, 14(3), 72–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536504215596955
Christoffersen, S., Murray, M., Arthurs, D., Barnard, C., Carpendale, S., Chu, B., Dugay, C., Forest, A., Hayes, A., Ledrew, E., Liang, S., Nickels, S., Papakyriakou, T., Parrott, J., Pulsifer, P., Reis, C., Scass, T., Sokol, J., Taylor, F., Vincent, W., Wilson, C. (2019). The Canadian Consortium for Arctic Data Interoperability: An Emerging Polar Information Network. Proceedings Polar Libraries Colloquy 2018 Developing polar networks: ideas & possibilities for the future. https://lauda.ulapland.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/63982/Christoffersen.Shannon%20et%20al..pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Daniel, R. (2019). Understanding Our Environment Requires an Indigenous Worldview. https://eos.org/opinions/understanding-our-environment-requires-an-indigenous-worldview
Dawson, J., Carter, N. A., van Luijk, N., Weber, M., & Cook, A. (2020). Arctic corridors and northern voices project: Methods for community-based participatory mapping for low impact shipping corridors in Arctic Canada. MethodsX, 7, 101064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2020.101064
Field, S. M., van Ravenzwaaij, D., Pittelkow, M., Hoek, J. M., & Derksen, M. (2021). Qualitative Open Science – Pain Points and Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/e3cq4
Gearheard, S., & Shirley, J. (2007). Challenges in Community-Research Relationships: Learning from Natural Science in Nunavut. Arctic, 60(1), 62–74. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40513159
Guen, F. (2021). Anonymise your data. EXCEL-Exercise. https://www.excel-exercise.com/anonymise-your-data/
International Arctic Social Sciences Association.(2020) IASSA Principles and Guidelines for Conducting Ethical Research in the Arctic. https://iassa.org/about-iassa/research-principles
Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami. (2018). National Inuit Strategy on Research. https://www.itk.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ITK_NISR-Report_English_low_res.pdf
ITK and NRI. (2006). Negotiating Research Relationships with Inuit Communities: A Guide for Researchers. Scot Nickels, Jamal Shirley, and Gita Laidler (eds). Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Nunavut Research Institute: Ottawa and Iqaluit. 25 pp. https://www.nri.nu.ca/sites/default/files/public/files/06-068%20ITK%20NRR%20booklet.pdf
Kantoris, C. (2020). Deidentifying Data. RPubs by RStudio. https://rpubs.com/ckantoris2/642533
McCann, H. S., Pulsifer, P. L., & Behe, C. (2016). 9 Sharing and preserving Indigenous knowledge of the Arctic using information and communications technology. Indigenous notions of ownership and libraries, archives and museums, 166, 126. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Heidi-Mccann/publication/326327443_9_Sharing_and_Preserving_Indigenous_Knowledge_of_the_Arctic_Using_Information_and_Communications_Technology/links/5b4617a0458515b4f663ec08/9-Sharing-and-Preserving-Indigenous-Knowledge-of-the-Arctic-Using-Information-and-Communications-Technology.pdf
Murphy, C. M., & Verden, C. (2011). A Student’s Guide to Navigating the IRB: How to Successfully Navigate a Potentially Overwhelming Process. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 84, 95. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1136504.pdf
qualtrics. (n.d.). Security Survey Options. https://www.qualtrics.com/support/survey-platform/survey-module/survey-options/survey-protection/
San Jose State University. (n.d.). Sample IRB application relevant for those conducting surveys. https://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/weinstein.agrawal/urbp298_SampleIRBProposal_Mathur.pdf
Schang, Trant, A. J., Bohnert, S. A., Closs, A. M., Humchitt, M., McIntosh, K. P., Way, R. G., & Wickham, S. B. (2020). Ecological research should consider Indigenous peoples and stewardship. Facets, 5(1), 534–537. https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2019-0041
Skinner, B. (2021). duawranglr: Securely Wrangle Dataset According to Data Usage Agreement. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/duawranglr/index.html
Teachers College, Columbia University. (n.d.). Research Instrument Examples. https://www.tc.columbia.edu/media/administration/institutional-review-board-/guide-amp-resources—documents/Published_Study-Material-Examples.pdf
University of Alaska Fairbanks. (n.d.). Research with Indigenous Peoples. https://www.uaf.edu/irb/indigenous/
University of California Irvine. (n.d.). Drafting the Informed Consent Form. https://research.uci.edu/human-research-protections/research-subjects/informed-consent/drafting-the-informed-consent-form/
U.S. Interagency Arctic Research Policy Committee (IARPC). (2018). Principles for Conducting Research in the Arctic (2018). https://www.iarpccollaborations.org/uploads/cms/documents/principles_for_conducting_research_in_the_arctic_final_2018.pdf
University of Texas at Arlington. (n.d.). All Required Documents for IRB Submission. https://resources.uta.edu/research/_documents/rs_documents/IRB%20Forms%20and%20Templates/All%20Required%20Documents%20Chart.pdf
Wong, C., Ballegooyen, K., Ignace, L., Johnson, M. J., & Swanson, H. (2020). Towards reconciliation: 10 Calls to Action to natural scientists working in Canada. Facets, 5(1), 769-783. https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2020-0005
Yua, E., Raymond-Yakoubian, J., Daniel, R. A., & Behe, C. (2022). A framework for co-production of knowledge in the context of Arctic research. Ecology and Society, 27(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12960-270134